Thursday we spoke of Paul Johnson's struggling program as being akin to a soup kitchen for players who have nowhere else to go. Well it looks like another one of those vagabonds has found himself a home.
Georgia Tech astoundingly lost its fourth committed defensive prospect in two weeks Sunday, as Huntsville, AL DE Trey Flowers switched allegiances to the University of Arkansas. Flowers's defection comes a scant four days after he had announced his Tech commitment. As a matter of fact, according to message board chatter, Flowers was on a secret visit to an Arkansas recruiting event no more than TWO days after pledging to Coach Johnson. How's that "no visit" policy working out for you now Coach?
It's a risky move to be sure for a last-minute reach like Flowers, as Arkansas is oversigned this season at 29 players, raising the very real possibly that he could be cut from the program at some future date in order to keep it below NCAA scholarship limits. The switch is also puzzling from an academic perspective, as Flowers is a 4.0 student who had been grandly voicing his intention only days earlier to major in engineering at Tech. Given this continued attrition, the uninitiated might wonder if Tech wasn't going through some kind of staff upheaval or similar turmoil, but it appears that this is nothing more than business as usual under Coach Johnson.
In fact to hear Johnson tell it, things couldn't be more hunky-dory. An interview published Saturday with the AJC's Mark Bradley on the very topic of recruiting saw him peddle little else than his usual schtick, namely "It's kind of been blown out of proportion a little" and the classic standby, “I think [recruiting is] going well." We can only assume that "It is what it is" was left on the cutting room floor.
As Bradley observes:
[Johnson is] a pragmatist of the first rank, and a bit of a contrarian. When asked a question, he often begins his response with, “Oh, I don’t know …” or “Not really.” He’s a football lifer who has seen pretty much everything... |
You forgot the word arrogant, Mr. Bradley-- as in "arrogant enough to think he's seen pretty much everything." Or how about "arrogant enough to think he can win national titles with Sun Belt talent." The reality is that Georgia Tech is Johnson's FIRST major conference experience in ANY capacity, and he has most certainly NOT seen everything there is to see. His clumsiness in the management of team morale and recruiting at a major college football program has been thoroughly exposed this season as the talent and leadership of Chan Gailey's players have filtered out of the program.
Coach Johnson talks recruiting with the AJC's Mark Bradley |
Johnson further uses the interview as a platform to reject the significance of sheer talent in recruiting, claiming instead that what's important is "how hard a guy is going to work." While that's all fine and well, I'm sure that many lower division players work just as hard as their peers in the BCS conferences, yet I doubt anyone would take a team of "hardworking" FCS or Sun Belt "champions" over a team of even the most shiftless 4 and 5 star athletes from the SEC. Johnson's attitude is yet another one of those philosophical holdovers from the lower divisions which he so stubbornly refuses to change-- he believes his "genius" system alone is enough to win football games, and that a roster of talented players is a mere luxury as long as it exhibits obedience and "work ethic." This Pop Warner outlook will ultimately lead Tech's program to disaster.
Johnson later commands Bradley to "ask [him] again in three years" about this recruiting class. “You want to judge recruiting?” he says, “How many games did you win? That’s the best bottom line.” Well you've been here three years already Coach, and its been two years since your first full recruiting class. Where are the budding playmakers? Where are the players fans can get excited about? Johnson even admits that his team didn't "make [its] breaks" last year. And as much as he wants to push Orwin Smith and redshirted offensive linemen as proof of his recruiting acumen, six wins, a crumbling 2011 class, and unflattering prospects for next season beg to the contrary.
But then again, Johnson would seem to be right in his element... is he not the consummate contrarian? I'm sure he'll find plenty of opportunity in the coming years to unspool trademark catchphrases like "Oh, I don't know" and "Not really" as his program continues its free fall toward irrelevance.
The recruiting rankings are a bit overblown when it comes to Tech or UGA for that matter. Here’s proof:
ReplyDeleteGoing back to 2002, here are Tech and UGA’s recruiting class rankings per rivals.com:
UGA:
2002-#3
2003-#6
2004-#6
2005-#10
2006-#4
2007-#9
2008-#7
2009-#6
2010-#15
2011-#7 currently
GT:
2002-#55
2003-#50
2004-#52 (with Calvin Johnson and Daryl Richard)
2005-#54
2006-#52
2007-#18
2008-#49 (Transition class from CCG to CPJ)
2009-#49 (21 commits)
2010-#43 (18 commits)
2011-#40 currently
So while Chan Gailey cracked the Top 50 twice in his entire tenure at GT (2003) & (2007) he supposedly could recruit? Why, because he found some “diamonds in the rough” who turned into NFL players like Wheeler, Walker, Butler, Matthews? I think the proof shows CCG really had one good class (2007), and had a couple great players he found that people missed out on (Jonathan Smith, PJ Daniels, etc).
On the flip side, Paul Johnson has had 3 real recruiting classes on his own (counting this year) where he still can’t sign a full class until next year. In that time, his classes have each moved up the recruiting rankings chart. This class isn’t done, and has a real chance to finish with boom. 3 major players are still possible which would propel Tech into the Top 30-35 range. Solid.
What’s UGA’s excuse for the lack of success? The so called mythical “Dream Team” is currently ranked where UGA’s normal classes rank. The truth is, CMR is running out of gimmicks in Athens. The hype from 2007 was a bust, and it’s been all downhill since. If I was a UGA fan, I’d hope this class is as highly rated as the hype of some of the players suggests, so maybe the next coach will have a roster full of talent he can attempt to take to the next level.
We are major league screwed....he needs to go NOW!
ReplyDeleteWas at the BB game last night (another disaster on its own) When they showed the "johnson" on the big screen, there was mostly apathy, but certainly as many or more "boos" than applause...
Tick....tick...tick...hear it johnson??...tick...tick...tick...its gonna ring real soon...
Ugay fans gotta luv the johnson. Getting in- state top talent is like shooting ducks in a bucket.
We've already covered your point in the past. Yes, Gailey's recruiting classes were terrible for the most part. That hardly makes him the gold standard for what recruiting should be at Tech. The fact that a couple of Johnson's classes "beat" his in the ranking is hardly cause for celebration. Now if Johnson could beat some of George O'Leary's classes, then we'd be impressed.
ReplyDeleteAre you seriously celebrating a series of recruiting classes ranked in the 40s? People like you are the epitome of The Johnson Problem.
In reality, there's probably negligible difference between Johnson's "40th" ranked classes and Gailey's "50th" ranked classes. Maybe Johnson had a couple more of his "NR" recruits bumped up after committing. You bring up Gailey's "lone" great class (2007)-- well Johnson sure got a hell of a lot of mileage out of it, and then plummeted to earth once it disappeared. Funny how you don't point THAT out RE: recruiting rankings.
I would also add that, overall, the services give SIGNIFICANTLY more 3-star rankings than they used to give. Take a look at the Dr. Saturday article I cited the other day. Rivals gave out ~500 more 3-star in 2010 compared to 2006. How many GT players have been magically bumped from NR or 2 stars up to 3 stars this year after committing? I count at least 4 off the top of my head. You didn't see as much of that in the earlier part of the decade. I would imagine many of those NR guys Gailey had the first few years at least would have gotten a 2 star, and possibly a 3 star today. That sort of thing may have boosted his class rankings just like it has Johnson's.
I don't know why people insist on bringing up UGA. Up until the last two years, they had like 6 10-win seasons out of 8, and 2 SEC titles in the 2000s. I wonder if they could have done that with 40th ranked recruiting classes every year. Plus they've beaten Tech head to head 9 of 10 and 16 of 20. This is another one of those ridiculous arguments your average Kool Aid Slurper makes: that the sole indication of success or "winning" is to win a national title, so UGA is not "winning" with their top recruiting classes, and this somehow makes it OK that GT doesn't get high ranked classes.
Yeah, UGA has had a string of "top recruiting classes". But when we hound them about it, we always forget to mention that because they had a #7 or #9 Nationally ranked class, they have never been #1 or #2 in their conference. They lose to teams that are suppose to beat them. And they whoop us all the time like they are suppose to.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite two arguments that I'm hearing right now are that 1) if recruiting rankings meant anything, then why isn't UGA beating Tech by MORE than a touchdown, and 2) if Tech had UGA's recruits, it'd be national champions. In other words, Tech has better players and better coaches but somehow loses every year. Go figure.
ReplyDelete